 |
| (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
The internet is full of feminist wrath and
illogical hysteria against the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Hobby Lobby
case. The fems did not get their way, and it’s bringing out the worst
in them.
Let’s dissect a few of their flawed arguments making the rounds in the cyber world:
Here’s a classic headline: “BREAKING: SCOTUS Decides Corporations Have Religious Liberty, Women Do Not In Choosing Birth Control.“
Translation: Because corporations are not being forced to pay for it, I no longer have any freedom when it comes to choosing my birth control.
Doesn’t this sound like the poutiest, melodramatic, victim-ish statement in the world? And I can just hear the scoffing, dismissive way the author typed out “religious liberty.”
Looky here, Ms. Magazine: My employer doesn’t pay for the wine I drink at dinner (despite the health benefits!), but that doesn’t mean I’m obliged to drink Boon’s Farm and Boon’s Farm only.
I can buy whatever kind of wine I want, because my employer pays me money that I can use freely in any way I choose. My choices may be more limited because I am paying for the wine myself, but that comes down to my own budgetary choices and an expensive palate.
Furthermore, we all have a choice in our employer. No matter whom you work for (unless it be, say, Hugh Hefner), certain things won’t be paid for, while others will.
Employers are not required to pay for contraceptive coverage, but many still will. In fact, Hobby Lobby isn’t against paying for all contraceptive services. They are just vehemently opposed to paying for abortifacients.
“A majority of Americans agree that women should have access to affordable birth control,” says the writer. Must I point out that this ruling doesn’t shut down any contraceptive-producing factories, nor take such products off any shelves?
The “access” is still there. This same article calls the ruling a “major blow to reproductive rights.”
Did feminists just never have sex before Obamacare?
“As many as 88% of American women who have ever had sexual intercourse have used some form of contraception,” the mysterious “Ms.” goes on.
As many as 98% of Americans (I’m guessing here) who have ever brushed their teeth used some form of brush and dentifrice. Is this not a form of healthcare. Can I, then, submit the receipt for my toothbrush and paste to HR for reimbursement?
What about my contact solution? Band-Aids? No? Why not? Where does it end?
There will be perks and drawbacks to every job. If my priority in life were to have my employer pay for my alcohol, I would go work at a bar and be the happiest wine-o in the world.
The court simply upheld what had been the status quo prior to the passage of the Affordable Care Act. No liberties were taken away, the feminists just weren’t granted new, special privileges.
Let’s dissect a few of their flawed arguments making the rounds in the cyber world:
Here’s a classic headline: “BREAKING: SCOTUS Decides Corporations Have Religious Liberty, Women Do Not In Choosing Birth Control.“
Translation: Because corporations are not being forced to pay for it, I no longer have any freedom when it comes to choosing my birth control.
Doesn’t this sound like the poutiest, melodramatic, victim-ish statement in the world? And I can just hear the scoffing, dismissive way the author typed out “religious liberty.”
Looky here, Ms. Magazine: My employer doesn’t pay for the wine I drink at dinner (despite the health benefits!), but that doesn’t mean I’m obliged to drink Boon’s Farm and Boon’s Farm only.
I can buy whatever kind of wine I want, because my employer pays me money that I can use freely in any way I choose. My choices may be more limited because I am paying for the wine myself, but that comes down to my own budgetary choices and an expensive palate.
Furthermore, we all have a choice in our employer. No matter whom you work for (unless it be, say, Hugh Hefner), certain things won’t be paid for, while others will.
Employers are not required to pay for contraceptive coverage, but many still will. In fact, Hobby Lobby isn’t against paying for all contraceptive services. They are just vehemently opposed to paying for abortifacients.
“A majority of Americans agree that women should have access to affordable birth control,” says the writer. Must I point out that this ruling doesn’t shut down any contraceptive-producing factories, nor take such products off any shelves?
The “access” is still there. This same article calls the ruling a “major blow to reproductive rights.”
Did feminists just never have sex before Obamacare?
“As many as 88% of American women who have ever had sexual intercourse have used some form of contraception,” the mysterious “Ms.” goes on.
As many as 98% of Americans (I’m guessing here) who have ever brushed their teeth used some form of brush and dentifrice. Is this not a form of healthcare. Can I, then, submit the receipt for my toothbrush and paste to HR for reimbursement?
What about my contact solution? Band-Aids? No? Why not? Where does it end?
There will be perks and drawbacks to every job. If my priority in life were to have my employer pay for my alcohol, I would go work at a bar and be the happiest wine-o in the world.
The court simply upheld what had been the status quo prior to the passage of the Affordable Care Act. No liberties were taken away, the feminists just weren’t granted new, special privileges.
The internet is full of feminist
wrath and illogical hysteria against the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Hobby
Lobby case. The fems did not get their way, and it’s bringing out the worst in
them.
Let’s dissect a few of their flawed
arguments making the rounds in the cyber world:
Here’s a classic headline:
“BREAKING: SCOTUS Decides Corporations Have Religious Liberty, Women Do
Not In Choosing Birth Control."
Translation: Because corporations
are not being forced to pay for it, I no longer have any freedom when it comes
to choosing my birth control.
Doesn’t this sound like the
poutiest, melodramatic, victim-ish statement in the world? And I can just hear
the scoffing, dismissive way the author typed out “religious liberty.”
Looky here, Ms. Magazine: My
employer doesn’t pay for the wine I drink at dinner (despite the health
benefits!), but that doesn’t mean I’m obliged to drink Boon’s Farm and Boon’s
Farm only.
I can buy whatever kind of wine I
want, because my employer pays me money that I can use freely in any way I
choose. My choices may be more limited because I am paying for the wine myself,
but that comes down to my own budgetary choices and an expensive palate.
Furthermore, we all have a choice in
our employer. No matter whom you work for (unless it be, say, Hugh Hefner),
certain things won’t be paid for, while others will.
Employers are not required to pay
for contraceptive coverage, but many still will. In fact, Hobby Lobby isn’t
against paying for all contraceptive services. They are just vehemently
opposed to paying for abortifacients.
“A majority of Americans agree that
women should have access to affordable birth control,” says the writer. Must I
point out that this ruling doesn’t shut down any contraceptive-producing
factories, nor take such products off any shelves?
The “access” is still there. This
same article calls the ruling a “major blow to reproductive rights.”
Did feminists just never have sex before
Obamacare?
“As many as 88% of American
women who have ever had sexual intercourse have used some form of
contraception,” the mysterious “Ms.” goes on.
As many as 98% of Americans (I’m
guessing here) who have ever brushed their teeth used some form of brush and
dentifrice. Is this not a form of healthcare. Can I, then, submit the receipt
for my toothbrush and paste to HR for reimbursement?
What about my contact solution?
Band-Aids? No? Why not? Where does it end?
There will be perks and drawbacks to
every job. If my priority in life were to have my employer pay for my alcohol,
I would go work at a bar and be the happiest wine-o in the world.
The court simply upheld what had
been the status quo prior to the passage of the Affordable Care Act. No liberties were taken
away, the feminists just weren’t granted new, special privileges.
The internet is full of feminist wrath and
illogical hysteria against the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Hobby Lobby
case. The fems did not get their way, and it’s bringing out the worst
in them.
Let’s dissect a few of their flawed arguments making the rounds in the cyber world:
Here’s a classic headline: “BREAKING: SCOTUS Decides Corporations Have Religious Liberty, Women Do Not In Choosing Birth Control.“
Translation: Because corporations are not being forced to pay for it, I no longer have any freedom when it comes to choosing my birth control.
Doesn’t this sound like the poutiest, melodramatic, victim-ish statement in the world? And I can just hear the scoffing, dismissive way the author typed out “religious liberty.”
Looky here, Ms. Magazine: My employer doesn’t pay for the wine I drink at dinner (despite the health benefits!), but that doesn’t mean I’m obliged to drink Boon’s Farm and Boon’s Farm only.
I can buy whatever kind of wine I want, because my employer pays me money that I can use freely in any way I choose. My choices may be more limited because I am paying for the wine myself, but that comes down to my own budgetary choices and an expensive palate.
Furthermore, we all have a choice in our employer. No matter whom you work for (unless it be, say, Hugh Hefner), certain things won’t be paid for, while others will.
Employers are not required to pay for contraceptive coverage, but many still will. In fact, Hobby Lobby isn’t against paying for all contraceptive services. They are just vehemently opposed to paying for abortifacients.
“A majority of Americans agree that women should have access to affordable birth control,” says the writer. Must I point out that this ruling doesn’t shut down any contraceptive-producing factories, nor take such products off any shelves?
The “access” is still there. This same article calls the ruling a “major blow to reproductive rights.”
Did feminists just never have sex before Obamacare?
“As many as 88% of American women who have ever had sexual intercourse have used some form of contraception,” the mysterious “Ms.” goes on.
As many as 98% of Americans (I’m guessing here) who have ever brushed their teeth used some form of brush and dentifrice. Is this not a form of healthcare. Can I, then, submit the receipt for my toothbrush and paste to HR for reimbursement?
What about my contact solution? Band-Aids? No? Why not? Where does it end?
There will be perks and drawbacks to every job. If my priority in life were to have my employer pay for my alcohol, I would go work at a bar and be the happiest wine-o in the world.
The court simply upheld what had been the status quo prior to the passage of the Affordable Care Act. No liberties were taken away, the feminists just weren’t granted new, special privileges.
Let’s dissect a few of their flawed arguments making the rounds in the cyber world:
Here’s a classic headline: “BREAKING: SCOTUS Decides Corporations Have Religious Liberty, Women Do Not In Choosing Birth Control.“
Translation: Because corporations are not being forced to pay for it, I no longer have any freedom when it comes to choosing my birth control.
Doesn’t this sound like the poutiest, melodramatic, victim-ish statement in the world? And I can just hear the scoffing, dismissive way the author typed out “religious liberty.”
Looky here, Ms. Magazine: My employer doesn’t pay for the wine I drink at dinner (despite the health benefits!), but that doesn’t mean I’m obliged to drink Boon’s Farm and Boon’s Farm only.
I can buy whatever kind of wine I want, because my employer pays me money that I can use freely in any way I choose. My choices may be more limited because I am paying for the wine myself, but that comes down to my own budgetary choices and an expensive palate.
Furthermore, we all have a choice in our employer. No matter whom you work for (unless it be, say, Hugh Hefner), certain things won’t be paid for, while others will.
Employers are not required to pay for contraceptive coverage, but many still will. In fact, Hobby Lobby isn’t against paying for all contraceptive services. They are just vehemently opposed to paying for abortifacients.
“A majority of Americans agree that women should have access to affordable birth control,” says the writer. Must I point out that this ruling doesn’t shut down any contraceptive-producing factories, nor take such products off any shelves?
The “access” is still there. This same article calls the ruling a “major blow to reproductive rights.”
Did feminists just never have sex before Obamacare?
“As many as 88% of American women who have ever had sexual intercourse have used some form of contraception,” the mysterious “Ms.” goes on.
As many as 98% of Americans (I’m guessing here) who have ever brushed their teeth used some form of brush and dentifrice. Is this not a form of healthcare. Can I, then, submit the receipt for my toothbrush and paste to HR for reimbursement?
What about my contact solution? Band-Aids? No? Why not? Where does it end?
There will be perks and drawbacks to every job. If my priority in life were to have my employer pay for my alcohol, I would go work at a bar and be the happiest wine-o in the world.
The court simply upheld what had been the status quo prior to the passage of the Affordable Care Act. No liberties were taken away, the feminists just weren’t granted new, special privileges.
The internet is full of feminist wrath and
illogical hysteria against the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Hobby Lobby
case. The fems did not get their way, and it’s bringing out the worst
in them.
Let’s dissect a few of their flawed arguments making the rounds in the cyber world:
Here’s a classic headline: “BREAKING: SCOTUS Decides Corporations Have Religious Liberty, Women Do Not In Choosing Birth Control.“
Translation: Because corporations are not being forced to pay for it, I no longer have any freedom when it comes to choosing my birth control.
Doesn’t this sound like the poutiest, melodramatic, victim-ish statement in the world? And I can just hear the scoffing, dismissive way the author typed out “religious liberty.”
Looky here, Ms. Magazine: My employer doesn’t pay for the wine I drink at dinner (despite the health benefits!), but that doesn’t mean I’m obliged to drink Boon’s Farm and Boon’s Farm only.
I can buy whatever kind of wine I want, because my employer pays me money that I can use freely in any way I choose. My choices may be more limited because I am paying for the wine myself, but that comes down to my own budgetary choices and an expensive palate.
Furthermore, we all have a choice in our employer. No matter whom you work for (unless it be, say, Hugh Hefner), certain things won’t be paid for, while others will.
Employers are not required to pay for contraceptive coverage, but many still will. In fact, Hobby Lobby isn’t against paying for all contraceptive services. They are just vehemently opposed to paying for abortifacients.
“A majority of Americans agree that women should have access to affordable birth control,” says the writer. Must I point out that this ruling doesn’t shut down any contraceptive-producing factories, nor take such products off any shelves?
The “access” is still there. This same article calls the ruling a “major blow to reproductive rights.”
Did feminists just never have sex before Obamacare?
“As many as 88% of American women who have ever had sexual intercourse have used some form of contraception,” the mysterious “Ms.” goes on.
As many as 98% of Americans (I’m guessing here) who have ever brushed their teeth used some form of brush and dentifrice. Is this not a form of healthcare. Can I, then, submit the receipt for my toothbrush and paste to HR for reimbursement?
What about my contact solution? Band-Aids? No? Why not? Where does it end?
There will be perks and drawbacks to every job. If my priority in life were to have my employer pay for my alcohol, I would go work at a bar and be the happiest wine-o in the world.
The court simply upheld what had been the status quo prior to the passage of the Affordable Care Act. No liberties were taken away, the feminists just weren’t granted new, special privileges.
Let’s dissect a few of their flawed arguments making the rounds in the cyber world:
Here’s a classic headline: “BREAKING: SCOTUS Decides Corporations Have Religious Liberty, Women Do Not In Choosing Birth Control.“
Translation: Because corporations are not being forced to pay for it, I no longer have any freedom when it comes to choosing my birth control.
Doesn’t this sound like the poutiest, melodramatic, victim-ish statement in the world? And I can just hear the scoffing, dismissive way the author typed out “religious liberty.”
Looky here, Ms. Magazine: My employer doesn’t pay for the wine I drink at dinner (despite the health benefits!), but that doesn’t mean I’m obliged to drink Boon’s Farm and Boon’s Farm only.
I can buy whatever kind of wine I want, because my employer pays me money that I can use freely in any way I choose. My choices may be more limited because I am paying for the wine myself, but that comes down to my own budgetary choices and an expensive palate.
Furthermore, we all have a choice in our employer. No matter whom you work for (unless it be, say, Hugh Hefner), certain things won’t be paid for, while others will.
Employers are not required to pay for contraceptive coverage, but many still will. In fact, Hobby Lobby isn’t against paying for all contraceptive services. They are just vehemently opposed to paying for abortifacients.
“A majority of Americans agree that women should have access to affordable birth control,” says the writer. Must I point out that this ruling doesn’t shut down any contraceptive-producing factories, nor take such products off any shelves?
The “access” is still there. This same article calls the ruling a “major blow to reproductive rights.”
Did feminists just never have sex before Obamacare?
“As many as 88% of American women who have ever had sexual intercourse have used some form of contraception,” the mysterious “Ms.” goes on.
As many as 98% of Americans (I’m guessing here) who have ever brushed their teeth used some form of brush and dentifrice. Is this not a form of healthcare. Can I, then, submit the receipt for my toothbrush and paste to HR for reimbursement?
What about my contact solution? Band-Aids? No? Why not? Where does it end?
There will be perks and drawbacks to every job. If my priority in life were to have my employer pay for my alcohol, I would go work at a bar and be the happiest wine-o in the world.
The court simply upheld what had been the status quo prior to the passage of the Affordable Care Act. No liberties were taken away, the feminists just weren’t granted new, special privileges.
Supreme Court decision brings out the worst in feminists | Rare
No comments:
Post a Comment