Thursday, March 28, 2013

Run by Idiots....

ubuntu soft drink
(Photo credit: osde8info)
1. If you can get arrested for hunting or fishing without a license, but not for being in the country illegally,… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.

2. If you have to get your parents permission to go on a field trip or take an aspirin in school, but not to get an abortion,… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.

3. If you have to show identification to board an airplane, cash a check, buy liquor, or check out a library book, but not to vote, … you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.

4. If the government wants to ban stable, law-abiding citizens from owning gun magazines with more than ten rounds, but gives 20 F-16 fighter jets to the crazy new leaders in Egypt, you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.

5. If, in our largest city, you can buy "two" 16-ounce sodas, but not a 24-ounce soda because 24-ounces of a sugary drink might make you fat,… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.

6. If an 80-year-old woman and 3 yr old child can be stripped searched by the TSA, but a woman in a hijab is only subject to having her neck and head searched,… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.

7. If your government believes that the best way to eradicate trillions of dollars of debt is to spend trillions more,… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.

8. If a seven year old boy can be thrown out of school for saying his teacher is cute, but hosting a sexual exploration or diversity class in grade school is perfectly acceptable, … you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.

9. If children are forcibly removed from parents who discipline them with spankings while children of addicts are left in filth and drug infested homes…, you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.

10. If hard work and success are met with higher taxes and more government intrusion, while not working is rewarded with EBT cards, WIC checks, Medicaid, subsidized housing, and free cell phones,… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.

11. If you pay your mortgage faithfully, denying yourself the newest big screen TV while your neighbor buys iPhones, TVs and new cars, and the government forgives his debt when he defaults on his mortgage,… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.

12. If being stripped of the ability to defend yourself makes you more safe according to the government,… you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, March 22, 2013

Congressional Cafeteria

Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D., Fla.) sounded the alarm about one consequence of the budget cuts that have come as a result of the sequester: her aides’ ability to afford a “high-quality meal.” At a House hearing earlier this week, she worried that her staff is being “priced out” of a good meal due to price increases at the House cafeteria, and worried that a potential 8 percent budget cut for congressional offices would further lower “the quality of life” on Capitol Hill.



Maybe they could add the sandwiches suggested at I Hate The Media:

The Obama Surprise: Some days it’s all baloney and no bread. Other days it’s de-boned and spineless chicken on dark rye (You never really know what you’ll get. That’s why it’s called a surprise.)

The Barney Frank: Rump roast with an extra helping of salami.

The Harry Reid: Cold, aged beef with no seasoning on white bread.

The Ed Schultz: Beef tongue with an extra serving of fat. Always served hot.

The Keith Olbermann: This item has been removed from the menu.

The Joe Biden: This is a huge f’ing sandwich. It contains a lot of f’ing pork. It’s a f’ing fork-ready project. (NOTE: The Joe Biden Combo comes one fry short of a happy meal.)

The Nancy Pelosi: Cold, crusty chicken, hold the pickle, on old rye.

The Helen Thomas: Non-Kosher meats and cheeses that have been aged beyond recognition. It’s all served on Halal-friendly breads (all profits from this sandwich will be donated back to Palestinian freedom fighters seeking the destruction of Israel a peaceful two-state alternative.

The Tim Geitner: Lean, greasy turkey. Tax-free through April 15.

The Michelle Obama: You don’t order the Michelle Obama. The Michelle Obama orders you!

The Al Sharpton: A delightful low carb alternative featuring dark meat turkey wrapped in a thin skin of pure cheese.

The Ben Nelson: Sorry, ladies and gentlemen, The Ben Nelson has sold out.

The Ted Kennedy: Dry, aged liver patty. Ask for the Kennedy Combo and get a free Bloody Mary.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, March 18, 2013

Abraham Lincoln - Racist

Abraham Lincoln
Abraham Lincoln (Photo credit: paukrus)
Victor Volsky penned an excellent piece on Abraham Lincoln over at American Thinker. Here are a few excerpts.

On September 22, 1862, President Lincoln published the Emancipation Proclamation, declaring that as of January 1, 1863, all slaves would be set free...in the 10 states of the Confederation which were "in rebellion against the United States."  The slaves in the states that, willingly or unwillingly, were not part of the Confederacy, such as Kentucky, Maryland, or Delaware, were to remain in chains.  The hypocrisy of the Emancipation Proclamation was so blatant that even Lincoln's loyal secretary of state, William Seward, sarcastically observed, "We show our sympathy with slavery by emancipating slaves where we cannot reach them and holding them in bondage where we can set them free."

Moreover, if, according to the progressive version of history, abolition of slavery was the cause of the Civil War, why didn't Lincoln free the slaves right off the bat?  Why did he wait for many months -- and do it only when the war took a bad turn for the Union, and, more important, when the superpowers of the day, Great Britain and France, were about to recognize the Confederacy and come to its aid?  Viewed realistically, abolition of slavery was by any measure a stratagem in pursuit of a purely pragmatic goal: to win over British and French public opinion and scare away the Confederacy's potential allies, whose assistance might have had a crucial effect on the outcome of the war.  It was a brilliant and highly successful tactical move.

As a matter of fact, the president never tried to hide his real objective.  He wrote: "I view the matter [Emancipation Proclamation] as a practical war measure, to be decided upon according to the advantages or disadvantages it may offer to the suppression of the rebellion."  And here is another confession of the Great Emancipator: "I will also concede that emancipation would help us in Europe, and convince them that we are incited by something more than ambition."  Lincoln had every reason to fret over the Europeans' suspicions of his intentions.  The Old World largely (ironically, with the exception of that bastion of reaction, Russia) sided with the Confederacy, which was viewed as a victim of a predatory North driven by greed.



Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, March 11, 2013

Political Correctness Run Amok

No political correctness
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Political Correctness is Destroying America
by Joe Newby at Examiner.com

Politcal correctness - the idea of subsituting certain words or thoughts with others deemed to be "acceptable" - is destroying America.

The phrase has been in existence for many years. A Wikipedia entry notes an early usage of the term in the 18th Century, and proponents of liberal thought used it in the 1970's. The idea has been around at least since World War 1, and one website attributes the phrase to Leon Trotsky. In an address to the AIA in 2000, Bill Lind said it originated in a comic strip. We laugh at the idea of political correctness, but as Lind points out, it is deadly serious. He calls it the:
...great disease of our century, the disease that has left tens of millions of people dead in Europe, in Russia, in China, indeed around the world. It is the disease of ideology. PC is not funny. PC is deadly serious.
We have seen political correctness, or PC, rear its ugly head since the shootings in Tucson.

For example, one Member of Congress announced he would introduce legislation banning the use of crosshair graphics in political ads, and a CNN talk show host apologized after a guest used the term.

"We're trying to get away from using that kind of language," John King explained.

Others have actually suggested banning certain words from our vocabulary, as though that in and of itself would prevent other acts of violence.

Destruction of language was a central theme in George Orwell's signature novel 1984, a book that should be required reading for anyone concerned about the state of modern American politics, for in it one finds many parallels between the fictitious tyrannical state of Oceania and modern liberalism.

Remove words, and one removes thought; Remove thought, and one removes freedom. In a conversation with the main character, Winston Smith, one of the "creators" of Newspeak explained:
The whole climate of thought will be different. In fact there will be no thought, as we understand it now. Orthodoxy means not thinking -- not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness
If this sounds familiar, it should.

Consider the knee-jerk reaction many liberals have any time Sarah Palin speaks. Rather than apply critical thought to anything she says, they react like Pavlov's dogs, snarling and sniping because that is what they have been conditioned to do by their puppet masters.

Political correctness has extended its tentacles in other areas as well.

Consider the case of Cody Alicea, the California school boy ordered to remove an American flag from his bike because Latino students might be offended, or the more recent case of the Oklahoma school boy who was suspended from the first grade because he made a "gun gesture" with his hand.

Political correctness plays a huge role in any situation involving prayer, like the recent case in Hawaii where the state Senate bowed to the ACLU and became the first state to ban prayer in that legislative body.

As Lind points out, political correctness has as its primary goal, the advancement of a cultural Marxism. Lind explains:
...For the classical Marxist, it’s Marxist economics. For the cultural Marxist, it’s deconstruction. Deconstruction essentially takes any text, removes all meaning from it and re-inserts any meaning desired. So we find, for example, that all of Shakespeare is about the suppression of women, or the Bible is really about race and gender. All of these texts simply become grist for the mill, which proves that “all history is about which groups have power over which other groups.” So the parallels are very evident between the classical Marxism that we’re familiar with in the old Soviet Union and the cultural Marxism that we see today as Political Correctness.
The result of political correctness can be seen throughout modern American politics. Masses of people, hypnotized by the bumper-sticker campaign of a charismatic individual, fully supported by a lapdog media, elected one of the most liberal Presidents in American history.

Many cast their vote without thinking of the consequences, and the nation is now spiralling headfirst into socialism.

Anyone who disagrees with President Obama is instantly labeled a racist or a bigot, no matter how sound their argument.

Political correctness also plays a huge role in the advancement of many liberal causes like the environment or gay rights.

A casual observer can see how language is often changed to pursue the statist's goals, and those who disagree are instantly labeled "bigots", "deniers", or "haters".

What was once "global warming" is now "climate change"; "gay marriage" is now "marriage equality", and so on.

Lind concludes his essay by writing:
...America today is in the throes of the greatest and direst transformation in its history. We are becoming an ideological state, a country with an official state ideology enforced by the power of the state. In “hate crimes” we now have people serving jail sentences for political thoughts. And the Congress is now moving to expand that category ever further. Affirmative action is part of it. The terror against anyone who dissents from Political Correctness on campus is part of it. It’s exactly what we have seen happen in Russia, in Germany, in Italy, in China, and now it’s coming here. And we don’t recognize it because we call it Political Correctness and laugh it off. My message today is that it’s not funny, it’s here, it’s growing and it will eventually destroy, as it seeks to destroy, everything that we have ever defined as our freedom and our culture.
Political correctness is a disease that threatens the very fabric of our Republic.

Free speech and freedom of thought is the cure.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Public Education - The Root of Many Problems

Deutsch: Schulbusflotte Thomas Freightliner
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Lifted the following tidbits from Neal Boortz. They do an excellent job of pointing out the dismal failure of public education.


Do you think the average voter knows that America is NOT a democracy, that it was never designed to be a democracy, and that our founding fathers hated the very idea of democracy?  Your child is being taught right now that we are a democracy.  We’re not.

Does the average voter understand the difference between the rule of law and the rule of man?  Has your child ever been taught that one man’s life, liberty and property are protected by our Constitution from the designs of the majority?

Do you think the average voter knows that just 200 years ago it was considered to be a grave insult to call someone a “Democrat?”  It meant “One who caters to the mindless whims of the masses.”  You could get your butt kicked for insults like that.

Does the average voter know that there is no Constitutional right to cast a vote for president?  This fact isn’t exactly hidden,  it’s right there in the Supreme Court’s decision in Bush V. Gore (2000).  I will guarantee you that your child’s government school teaches them that they have a right to vote for president.

Do you think that our schools teach our children that it was the intention of our founding fathers that, in times of peace, 95 percent of all governance should come from local governments, with the remaining 5 percent coming from the federal level?

As your child how Senators were originally chosen.  Do they know that Senators were appointed by state legislatures?  Do they know that now, after the 17th Amendment, your state government has no official representation in Washington?

Your children have undoubtedly heard that the rich don’t pay their fair share.  Ask them if they have learned in school just what percentage of total income is earned by the top 1% of income earners, and what percentage of all collected income taxes they pay.  Ask they if they think this is a fair share?

Ask your children if they know of any historical writing that sets forth the idea of a progressive income tax, mandatory government-controlled education, high estate taxes, a central bank like the Federal Reserve and government control of the means of communication by an agency such as the FCC.  There is, as a matter of fact.  It’s called The Communist Manifesto.

You can read the full article here.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Waste Not, Want Not

Government spending
(Photo credit: 401(K) 2013)
There are a lot of elected officials in Washington that claim that there is no spending problem. They like to say the rich folk are not paying their fair share. Alan Caruba compiled a short list of some government spending that looks a little questionable to me. These examples that he pulled together from various sources are just a small sampling of where Politicians are sending tax dollars while continuing to cry for more.


# The government spends $1.7 billion for maintenance on empty buildings it owns, although some sources put the figure at closer to $25 billion. The Office of Management and Budget estimates that 55,000 properties are underutilized or entirely vacant. 
# The federal government owns approximately one-third of all U.S. land. It does not need more land and it could be argued that it should not own 80% of Nevada and Alaska, and more than half of Idaho. That said, it wants to spend $2.3 billion to purchase more land and the National park Service currently has a backlog of maintenance tasks totaling $5 billion. These include parks that the Obama administration was saying would all have to be closed down because of a sequester reduction of a mere 1.2% of all federal spending. 
# Homeland Security’s Janet Napolitano was issuing statements about the sequestration cuts to her department, but according to Tom Schatz, president of Citizens Against Government Waste, the department has $9 billion in unspent preparedness funds. How much of that will be spent on purchasing more DHS ammunition? They have already purchased enough to shoot every American five times. 
# Republican lawmakers in Congress took the sequester fear-mongering as an opportunity to note, as Rep. Tom Price (R-GA) said, “There are pots of money sitting in different departments across the federal government, that have been authorized over either a number of months or years.”  
# Rep. Tom Coburn (R-OK) is a leading budget hawk who identified programs to fund a space ship to another solar system, funds for advancements in beef jerky from France, and $6 billion for research to find out what lessons about democracy and decision-making can be learned—from fish! 
# While you’re trying to figure out how to pay your 2012 taxes, give a thought to the National Science Foundation $350,000 grant to Purdue University researchers on how to improve your golf game. 
# Not to be outspent, the National Institutes of Health gave a $940,000 grant to researchers who found that the production of pheromones in—wait for it—fruit flies, declines over time. Turns out that male fruit flies were more attracted to younger female fruit flies. The NIH also paid researchers to find out why gay men in Argentina engage in risky sexual behavior when they’re drunk and spent $800,000 in “stimulus funds” to study the impact of a “genital-washing” program on men in South Africa. You can’t make up this stuff. 
# For reasons that defy sanity, various elements of the government have spent $3 million for research on video games; $2.6 million to train Chinese prostitutes to drink responsibly; a whopping $500 million on a program that would, among other things, try to figure out why five-year-olds “can’t sit still” in a kindergarten classroom; and grants such as $1.8 million on a “museum of neon signs” in Las Vegas, Nevada. 
# Sanity does not apply to the $2 billion given annually to U.S. farmers to not farm their land. Don’t even ask about the Defense Department. It has long been famous for waste.
You can follow Alan Caruba at his blog, Warning Signs.
 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, March 1, 2013

Good Reads

Barack Obama
(Photo credit: jamesomalley)
March 1, 2013

Obama's Sequestration plan works to perfection

Keith Edwards
Anyone who is up in arms about Obama being the Bully-in-Chief and having their heart strings pulled because one of his White House toadies threatened a couple of liberal media types need to get your heads out of your rears!
We're talking about second term full-on hyper socialist agenda mode for team Obama. And what just took place at 12:00am this morning was the lynch pin in Obama's plan to cover up his crashing of the economy by successfully blaming sequestration and the pending economic catastrophe on the Republican Party.
With people like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity falling all over themselves to call out Barack the bully and all his toadies for doing what they've been doing for the past four years is just amazing to watch. It seems as if all the so called "leaders" of the conservative movement are just as "low information" as the 51percenters who voted Obama in for a second term.
Sequestration is nothing compared to what Obama has already set in motion for our economy. Every government accounting office and the majority of leading economists have been saying for the last several years that our economic trajectory is unsustainable and if left unchecked, America will eventually go the way of Greece. And nothing has changed!

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/03/obamas_sequestration_plan_works_to_perfection.html#ixzz2MIqrtscn 
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook


March 1, 2013

When the Obama Administration Goes After a Journalist for Reporting the Truth

Sally Zelikovsky
Bob Woodward isn't the first journalist to be thrown under the proverbial bus by the Obama Administration.  Back in April 2011, veteran San Francisco Chronicle journalist Carla Marinucci, was banned from the presidential press pool in San Francisco, a beat she'd been covering without incident for some time. 
Her sin?  Recording a group of leftwing hecklers who spontaneously sang a bizarre song (related to the Bradly Manning Wikileaks incident) in protest against Obama at a fundraiser in San Francisco -- a somewhat embarrassing moment for the president who was visibly caught off guard once he realized they weren't singing his praises.  Carla, a veritable Lois Lane and Jimmy Olsen all in one, videotaped the song and posted it on her "Shaky Hands" blog at SFGate.  That video can be viewed here.
In a Pravda-like effort, the Politburo at 1600 Penn Ave sought to excise this stunt from popular view by banning Ms. Marinucci from the pool, demanding that the video not be posted and promising retaliation if its threats were made public.  In a series of exchanges reminiscent of the Woodward episode, "key people" at the White House denied removing Ms. Marinucci from the press pool or threatening the Chronicle with retaliation.  Inexperienced novice reporters might have been intimidated by such strong arm tactics -- further chilling the speech they supposedly covet -- but Ms. Marinucci and her editors, Phil Bronstein and Ward Bushee, were undaunted as they exposed the Administration a la Bob Woodward.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/03/when_the_obama_administration_goes_after_a_journalist_for_reporting_the_truth.html#ixzz2MIrl1qM3
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Enhanced by Zemanta