Monday, February 28, 2011

Diss Me, Kate

Saw this great little item over at Hope and Change Cartoons. It was too good not to share.




Actually, Muammar Gaddafi wasn't on the final list of invitations for the royal wedding of England's Prince William and Kate Middleton...but even so, we're guessing that he came closer to making the cutoff than America's "new Camelot" couple, Barack and Michelle Obama.

In the interest of civility, some sources have suggested that they weren't invited simply because England couldn't afford the cost of the additional security which would be needed to keep Michelle from eating all the jumbo shrimp at the wedding reception. But we think there's more to it than that.

After all, Barack Obama has gone out of his way to offend the British every chance he gets. When beginning his presidency, he removed a bust of Winston Churchill from the Oval Office and sent it back to England. The bust had been given in the aftermath of 9/11, to remind Americans to be strong and know they had allies standing with them in troubled times. 
Ouch.

Mr. Obama also gifted the Prime Minister of England with a cheap collection of American movies on DVD which wouldn't play on British DVD players. He then topped himself by giving the Queen of England an iPod which was already filled with Obama's speeches and video of his inauguration. 
Double ouch.

Of course, the alleged First Family won't be lacking for social events even if they 
don't get to attend the wedding. They might throw another "Motown Night" to show that the president is working tirelessly on the growing chaos in the Mideast, or perhaps stage another Ramadan feast at which Mr. Obama can announce his support for new Islamic building projects at Ground Zero.

Or maybe they'll just spend a quiet evening at home watching the movies which were returned from England. Muammar Gaddafi can bring the popcorn.

Whee-Lo - A Classic

When I was a kid things were a lot simpler. We did not have endless TV entertainment or streaming video on the internet. Most of our toys were simpler as well. The bulk of them did not require batteries and to get the most of them you had to, gasp, actually use your imagination.


One of my favorites was the Whee-Lo. A simple contraption but hours of endless entertainment. The toy was also quite educational - it demonstrated scientific principles like kinetic energy, gravity and rotational energy. I think my folks liked it because it didn't make any noise.


If you've got a favorite let me know in the comments.

The Ten Most Blatant Examples Of Media Bias During Jan-Feb 2011 (Part One)

Read It Here:

Sunday, February 27, 2011

The American Spectator : All That Gold

Logo for the United States Occupational Safety...Image via WikipediaThe American Spectator : All That Gold


As Republican politicians look frantically for ways to solve the country's financial problems, they should not overlook the mountain of gold towering before them. That mountain is the accumulation of federal regulations that now occupies more than 82,000 pages in the Federal Register.
No one knows for sure what the cost of all those regulations is, but it is probably at least $1.75 trillion, or 14 percent of U.S. national income. By comparison, the income-tax burden is about $2.3 trillion.
The current Congress is not likely to be successful in repealing much of anything, given the veto power of the liberal progressive in the White House. But the House of Representatives could at least set the stage for massive repealing in preparation for the Republicans' taking control of the government in 2012.
High on the list of regulations that should be repealed is the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), enacted in 1970 with, alas, President Richard Nixon's enthusiastic support. OSHA was just one reason, and a good one, why conservatives suspended their support of Nixon -- until Watergate.
The mandate of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration created by that act is to protect workers from job-related injuries and illnesses. Its regulating is fanatically intrusive, and is estimated to cost around $65 billion a year. Its existence is justified in the literature with phrases like, "Since the 1970 enactment of OSHA, workplace injuries are sharply down…" Yes, and since the 1970 enactment the tides have been going in and out too.
In fact, despite all that oppressive regulating, the record indicates, remarkably, that OSHA has had no effect at all. A graph published by the CATO Institute shows that the decline in workplace fatalities was steady over a sixty-year period that began long before OSHA was created. Looking at the graph, it is impossible to point to the moment when OSHA commenced its massive meddling. The graph of non-fatal workplace injuries, on the other hand, is almost flat, also indicating that OSHA has made no difference.
What the science shows, therefore, is that OSHA has been completely ineffective. But who cares about science?

How a Taser Feels

This was an entertaining story found at random on the net on what it's like being tasered....

Last weekend I saw something at Larry's Pistol & Pawn Shop that sparked my interest. The occasion was our 15th anniversary and I was looking for a little something extra for my wife Julie. What I came across was a 100,000-volt, pocket/purse-sized taser. The effects of the taser were supposed to be short lived, with no long-term adverse affect on your assailant, allowing her adequate time to retreat to safety....?? 

WAY TOO COOL! Long story short, I bought the device and brought it home. 

I loaded two triple-a batteries in the darn thing and pushed the button. Nothing! I was disappointed. I learned, however, that if I pushed the button AND pressed it against a metal surface at the same time; I'd get the blue arch of electricity darting back and forth between the prongs.?? 

AWESOME!!!? 

Unfortunately, I have yet to explain to Julie what that burn spot is on the face of her microwave.?? 

Okay, so I was home alone with this new toy, thinking to myself that it couldn't be all that bad with only two triple-A batteries, right?! !?? 

There I sat in my recliner, my cat Gracie looking on intently (trusting little soul) while I was reading the directions and thinking that I really needed to try this thing out on a flesh & blood moving target. 

I must admit I thought about zapping Gracie (for a fraction of a second) and thought better of it. She is such a sweet cat. But, if I was going to give this thing to my wife to protect herself against a mugger, I did want some assurance that it would work as advertised. Am I wrong??? 

So, there I sat in a pair of shorts and a tank top with my reading glasses perched delicately on the bridge of my nose, directions in one hand, and taser in another. 

The directions said that a one-second burst would shock and disorient your assailant; a two-second burst was supposed to cause muscle spasms and a major loss of bodily control; a three-second burst would purportedly make your assailant flop on the ground like a fish out of water. Any burst longer than three seconds would be wasting the batteries.? ? All the while I'm looking at this little device measuring about 5" long, less than 3/4 inch in circumference; pretty cute really and (loaded with two itsy, bitsy triple-A batteries) thinking to myself, "no possible way!"?? 

What happened next is almost beyond description, but I'll do my best...? ? I'm sitting there alone, Gracie looking on with her head cocked to one side as to say, "don't do it master," reasoning that a one- second burst from such a tiny little ole thing couldn't hurt all that bad. I decided to give myself a one-second burst just for heck of it. I touched the prongs to my naked thigh, pushed the button,?and?? 

HOLY MOTHER OF GOD, WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION!!!?? 

I'm pretty sure Jessie Ventura ran in through the side door, picked me up in the recliner , then body slammed us both on the carpet, over and over and over again. 

I vaguely recall waking up on my side in the fetal position, with tears in my eyes, body soaking wet, both nipples on fire, testicles nowhere to be found, with my left arm tucked under my body in the oddest position, and tingling in my legs? 

The cat was standing over me making meowing sounds I had never heard before, licking my face, undoubtedly thinking to herself, "Do it again, stupid, do it again!"?? 

Note: If you ever feel compelled to "mug" yourself with a taser, one note of caution: there is no such thing as a one-second burst when you zap yourself! 

You will not let go of that thing until it is dislodged from your hand by a violent thrashing about on the floor. 

A three-second burst would be considered conservative?? 

SON-OF-A-... That hurt like **% !!! A minute or so later (I can't be sure, as time was a relative thing at that point), I collected my wits (what little I had left), sat up and surveyed the landscape. My bent reading glasses were on the mantel of the fireplace. How did they get up there??? My triceps, right thigh and both nipples were still twitching. My face felt like it had been shot up with Novocain, and my bottom lip weighed 88 lbs. I'm still looking for my testicles! I'm offering a significant reward for their safe return!! Still in shock!! 

P. S. My wife loved the gift, and now regularly threatens me with it!? 

"If you think Education is difficult, try being stupid."



Found at: Simply Because It Is
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, February 21, 2011

Kitchen Break - Marinated Corn Salad

Photo from "A Taste of Home." (tasteofhome.com)
What you'll need:
2 (16 ounce) cans white Shoe Peg corn, drained
1/2 cup chopped onion
1/2 cup chopped green bell pepper
1 (2 ounce) jar pimento, drained
2 stalks celery, chopped
1/2 cup sugar
1/4 cup vegetable oil
1 teaspoon salt
1/2 teaspoon pepper
3/4 cup white vinegar

Combine corn, onion, green pepper, pimento and celery in a bowl; mix well. Stir in mixture of sugar, oil, salt, pepper and vinegar. Chill, covered, overnight, tossing occasionally. Drain just before serving (or serve with  
slotted spoon). Yields 8 servings.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Coming Soon to a Bar Near You

HumbertobebidasImage via WikipediaAlcohol industry battles among itself over the issue of nutrition labels

You know, this issue of putting nutritional labels on alcoholic beverages is taking things a little too far. I mean I've been in a lot of bars and the only thing I've never seen anyone who said, "Nope, can't have another beer. I'm over my carb limit for the day." I also love the line on the label that shows "servings per container." Most of the guys I hang around with are more concerned with "containers per serving." Of course, the caloric content might come in handy. I could use it to figure out how many less calories I need from food on a given day.


Related articles
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, February 20, 2011

Obama on his embattled budget: Let's talk, but....

Obama on his embattled budget: Let's talk, but....


Sweeping hand gestures were the order of today as President Obama defended his budget at a news conference (full text below), reflecting widespread skepticism over the seriousness of his spending "cuts." At last, bipartisanship to believe in.
The Democrat invested 62 presidential minutes and about 8,000 chief executive words, many of them to defend his budget priorities. The first thing the nation needs to know is that President Obama is "confident." It's his new favorite phrase, supplanting "going forward."
But the Washington political community on both sides is also confident that the Democrat's immense budget is merely a placeholder for the real spending bargaining, which will come in the next two or three months over the budget and raising the debt ceiling.president Obama 2-15-11 News Conference
Washington wonders why so many angry Americans talk back to the news on their TVs. Here's why: Federal spending the last two years has exploded. Never mind why. It has. Obama proposes cutting some of that increased spending. The result: Cuts to brag about but still more borrowed spending than before.
And for his next trick.....

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Good Sportsmanship

Great Seal of the state of WisconsinImage via WikipediaRemember the bratty little kid in second grade who, when he did not get his way on the playground, would shout, "OK then. I'll just take my ball and go home."

That is sort of what Wisconsin Democrats did when they realized that they could not get their way on a vote to cut back collective bargaining rights of public sector unions. Only they went even further - they took a bus to another state (probably on the taxpayer dollar to boot).

Imagine the mainstream media shit storm that would have happened had this been the Republicans. Guess this is the bipartisanship that the Democrats are always whining about - "If we can't have our way, we will just refuse to participate." Maybe on the next tough vote they could threaten to hold their breath till they turn blue.

These people were elected to do a job - not run away when things get tough. Too bad the Governor can't just kick them out and appoint replacements.

I only wish we had enough Republicans in Washington so that the Democrats there would do the same thing (as long as the bus goes north and not south).

Just Slip Out the Back, Jack


Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

We’re Way Past the Time for a Machete

An example of street markets accepting credit ...Image via Wikipedia(Found this at http://www.imao.us/)

So even reporters are having trouble comprehending how absolutely impotent Obama’s budget is about the deficit. Yet Obama is still trying to convince the last few morons who take him seriously that he’s making big cuts or something. Here’s what he claimed: “To use an analogy that families are familiar with, we’re not going to be running up the credit card anymore.”

Dude, your budget is proposing 7.2 trillion in new debt over the next ten years; you obviously aren’t going to be running up the credit card because Discover ain’t touching that. And you think that is being fiscally responsible? This is not just at a level of not understanding economics; this is looking at a dollar bill and saying, “What in the world is that?”

And then Obama said this about budget cuts: “Let’s use a scalpel; let’s not use a machete.”

A SCALPEL?!! Do you see this massive jungle of debt growing outside choking everything? And you want to prick at that with a scalpel? Heck, even a machete is barely going to put a dent it. We need to agent orange that sucker. And that’s just to keep things from getting to the level where we need to nuke it from orbit.

Obama is later going to try to raise taxes. Obviously, it’s not to help reduce the deficit because there is no credible evidence he cares about such a thing. It will just be because of some weird fetish he has about confiscating other people’s money.

So it’s up to Republicans to save the country — which sucks, but that’s the way it is — and it’s up to Obama to be the enemy to that screaming about hurting seniors and poor people to try and get reelected because of how much we need his non-leadership for another four years. I’m not saying Obama is anti-American; I’m just saying if you’re pro-American, that’s going to require being very anti-Obama. Good luck to both America’s well-being and Obama’s political future — may the best one win.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Just How Bad is the Federal Debt?

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Tiger Spit - Much Ado About Nothing

OMG! Stop the presses! Tiger Woods spit on a golf green. The European Tour is going to fine him for this earth shattering insult to the decorum of the game.

My God people! Get a life. The game is played outdoors. It's not like he spit in the floor of the bar at the 19th hole. I know - I've heard the arguments. "What if another player wound up having to put his ball through the spit." All I can say is BFD. Wonder how many geese or other fowl have dumped a load on that green? Or how many disgusting bugs have died and are quietly being made into fertilizer on the hallowed putting surface.

Tiger had his mind on other things at the time - like trying to win a golf tournament.

Get over it people. We have more important things to worry about.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Hot Links

Warning Signs: Bankrupting America

100% Chance of a Terrorist Attack

Mike Adams suffered a "sychotic" breakdown

The Obama Budget: A Monument to Excess

The President’s budget: whistling past the graveyard

No Comparison – Top 7 Reasons Why Reagan Is Better Than Obama

The Unbearable Lightness of the Social Security "Trust Fund"
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, February 14, 2011

Always Look Both Ways

Title page to Locke's Some Thoughts Concerning...Image via WikipediaWhen I was growing up I was taught to always look both ways before crossing the street.

Apparently this lesson is not being taught in our modern educational system. It seems that some folks get so wrapped up when talking on their cell phones (or listening to their iPods) that this very important concept is forgotten.
But have no fear. Rather than allow these idiots to be removed from the gene pool some politicians feel that it is their responsibility to step in and try and legislate the problem away. If you don't believe me check this out:

Sen. Kruger Wants To Ban Chatting On Cell Phones While Crossing StreetCBS New York
Enhanced by Zemanta

Cash for Education Clunkers - Michelle Malkin - Townhall Conservative

American writer and blogger Michelle Malkin.Image via Wikipedia"We're going to have to out-educate other countries," President Obama urged this week. How? By out-spending them, of course! It's the same old quack cure for America's fat and failing government-run schools monopoly. The one-trick ponies at the White House call their academic improvement agenda "targeted investing" for "winning the future." Truth in advertising: Get ready to fork over more Cash for Education Clunkers.
Our government already spends more per capita on education than any other of the 34 wealthiest countries in the world except for Switzerland, according to recent analysis of data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Overall inflation-adjusted K-12 spending has tripled over the past 40 years, the Michigan-based Mackinac Center for Public Policy points out. Yet American test scores and graduation rates are stagnant. One in 10 high schools is a dropout factory. And our students' performance in one of the most prestigious global math competitions has been so abysmal that the U.S. simply withdrew altogether.

Arthur B. Laffer: Reaganomics: What We Learned - WSJ.com

Official Portrait of President Ronald ReaganImage via Wikipedia
For 16 years prior to Ronald Reagan's presidency, the U.S. economy was in a tailspin—a result of bipartisan ignorance that resulted in tax increases, dollar devaluations, wage and price controls, minimum-wage hikes, misguided spending, pandering to unions, protectionist measures and other policy mistakes.
In the late 1970s and early '80s, 10-year bond yields and inflation both were in the low double digits. The "misery index"—the sum of consumer price inflation plus the unemployment rate—peaked at well over 20%. The real value of the S&P 500 stock price index had declined at an average annual rate of 6% from early 1966 to August 1982.
Then Reagan entered center stage. His first tax bill was enacted in August 1981. It included a sweeping cut in marginal income tax rates, reducing the top rate to 50% from 70% and the lowest rate to 11% from 14%. The House vote was 238 to 195, with 48 Democrats on the winning side and only one Republican with the losers. The Senate vote was 89 to 11, with 37 Democrats voting aye and only one Republican voting nay. Reaganomics had officially begun.
President Reagan was not alone in changing America's domestic economic agenda. Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, first appointed by Jimmy Carter, deserves enormous credit for bringing inflation down to 3.2% in 1983 from 13.5% in 1981 with a tight-money policy. There were other heroes of the tax-cutting movement, such as Wisconsin Republican Rep. Bill Steiger and Wyoming Republican Sen. Clifford Hansen, the two main sponsors of an important capital gains tax cut in 1978.

Read the rest of the story here:
Arthur B. Laffer: Reaganomics: What We Learned - WSJ.com
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

$53 Billion for High Speed Rail

Amtrak train in downtown Orlando, Florida.Image via Wikipedia



$53 Billion for High Speed Rail

—Ace

Wait, it wasn't a joke? I swear, it sounded like a joke.

Vice Cretin Joe Biden, who seems like a developmentally-stunted oldster who just really needs to be kept in a sanitarium with a really cool model train kit, is of course pushing for it.
Biden, who estimated he has ridden Amtrak between Washington and his home in Wilmington, Delaware, some 7,900 times, made a strong pitch for rail transportation to enable the United States to compete and lead internationally."This is about seizing the future," he said...
Ben notes that Obama was willing to consider up to $775 million (with an m) in cuts to his budget. With one hand he giveth, with the other he bankrupteth.

U.S. taxpayers spent about $32 subsidizing the cost of the typical Amtrak passenger in 2008, about four times the rail operator's estimate, according to a private study.Amtrak operates a nationwide rail network, serving more than 500 destinations in 46 states. Forty-one of Amtrak's 44 routes lost money in 2008, said the study by Subsidyscope, an arm of the Pew Charitable Trusts.
...
Leading the list was the train traveling between New Orleans and Los Angeles — the Sunset Limited — which lost $462 per passenger. Taxpayers subsidize the losses to keep the passenger train service running.
That's a high price to pay, year after year, for a nostalgia act.

You know who hates all this? Reason magazine, which attacks government rail with vitriol and facts but mostly facts every other month. In California, a lot of money has been spent on high speed rail products that are simply phantoms.
The project is a high-decibel example of the magical thinking that takes hold when people talk about trains. A few years ago, when the rail bonds were being debated, I participated in the quaint ritual of an editorial board meeting at the Los Angeles Times in which we debated how to “weigh in” on this critical issue. While I, the team’s only mass transit rider, had the handicap of knowing what I was talking about, I was nonetheless pleased at the group’s readiness to acknowledge that the high-speed rail project offered only anemic ridership levels, endless subsidies, and a strong likelihood of never happening. But in the end, of course, we ran with an editorial titled “Believe in the Bullet Train.” The piece complained that “critics…base their arguments on the past, not the future.”The bullet train also exemplifies the arrogance and Bourbon high-handedness with which grand plans get made. Several times the California High Speed Rail Authority has been caught mapping out bullet train alignments and then failing to notify homeowners whose properties would be slated for seizure via eminent domain. The current plan would have the 220-mile-per-hour train running through well-populated residential areas. It also pits the Authority against Union Pacific over track resources, meaning the bullet train would essentially replace freight—the one genre of rail transport that remains viable and important to the economy—with a passenger rail project that has no hope of ever becoming sustainable.
Finally, the bullet train is a case study in the immortality of a bad idea. While the train itself may never become a reality, sheer political will makes the train project impossible to kill. “The project has been fighting every year to stay alive,” says Elizabeth Alexis, co-founder of Californians Advocating Responsible Rail Design, a watchdog group that supports a rail project in principle but is critical of the Authority. “So they did what they had to do to stay alive, because that’s better than being dead.”
After 14 years of no life signs, how can you tell the difference? Amtrak used to try and lure riders with the slogan “There’s Something About a Train That’s Magic.” In reality, we know that magical trains exist only in cartoons.
I like that part about the train supposedly going 220 miles per hour through the hearts of residential neighborhoods. Yeah, not going to happen; even if it were built it would be forbidden, by law, from going over 70 mph.

But let's pretend. Because that's all America is now, starshine and unicorn glow.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Shared Prosperity by Neal Boortz

It's no wonder that the Chamber of Commerce didn't do its best Nancy Pelosi cheerleading impression during yesterday's speech by Barack Obama. Flashback: Remember when Nancy Pelosi sat behind PrezBO at his State of the Union address and it appeared as though there were springs in her seat? She kept popping up and clapping with that fake grin plastered on her face. Well anyway .. that is entirely the opposite reaction that Obama got from the Chamber of Commerce yesterday. Apparently he was only interrupted by applause twice during his 35 minute speech. I have a sneaking suspicion that that the Chamber could not have applauded, even if it wanted to (though it didn't want to) .. because they were just stunned by some of the words billowing forth from our dear leader, the Community Organizer.
"If we're fighting to reform the tax code and increase exports, the benefits cannot just translate into greater profits and bonuses for those at the top. They have to be shared by American workers, who need to know that opening markets will lift their standard of living as well as your bottom line."
You read that correctly, folks. "They have to be shared by American workers." How do you like that?
Now ... let's do a quick Cliff Notes review of this man as it relates to commerce and the private markets.
Barack Obama is a man who has:
  • Never had to write a business plan
  • Never had to review a business plan to determine its worthiness
  • Never had to create a budget for a private business
  • Never had to calculate the economic worth of an existing or new employee for a business
  • Never had to worry about the cost of benefits provided to a business employee
  • Never had to worry about whether or not a business was making a profit
  • Never had to explain to a boss or to shareholders why a business was losing money
  • Never had to file a business tax return
  • Never had to talk to an accountant about business matters
  • Never had to hire an attorney to deal with business matters
  • Never had to worry about the effects of government regulations on a business he owns or operates
  • Never had to tell an employee that he was being let go because business was slow
  • Never had to place a "help-wanted" ad looking for a new worker
  • Never had to look at a list of revenues and expenses to determine how much a new employee can be paid.
  • Never had to face competition from a new business down the street
.... And most importantly:
Barack Obama is a man who has referred to the private sector as "the enemy." And don't think that these men and women of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce didn't remember that line while he was reading his teleprompter in front of them yesterday.
In short ... this is a man who has no idea in the universe what it means to own and operate a business, yet there he is telling businesses that they have to go out there and figure out how they can hire more people? Is he serious? In what parallel universe does it become the purpose and overriding objective business to simply try to figure out how to hire more people?
Let's look bad at some of Obama's previous utterings:
  • "At some point you just have to admit you've made enough money."
  • "You need to spread the wealth around."
  • And one of my all-time favorites: You have to raise taxes not to increase government revenue, but "out of fairness."
That's right! It's just not fair that you are earning that much money ... se we have to take it from you and spread it around.
We have an avowed enemy of the private sector .. a man with zero business experience himself .. standing up in front of a room of businessmen and telling them that they are actually in business to hire people and share the wealth. WRONG! They are in business to make money for their owners and/or shareholders. To do that they hire people who can help produce wealth, and they pay those people a competitive wage to keep them on the payroll. This, of course, is completely lost on someone who considers the private sector to be his enemy. That's OK though ... the private sector looks at him the same way.
I am reminded of that Russian Newspaper article that appeared right before Obama was elected. The Pravda newspaper ran an article, "American Capitalism Gone with a Whimper" for a title? Here's a quote from the article:
"It must be said, that like the breaking of a great dam, the American descent into Marxism is happening with breath taking speed, against the back drop of a passive, hapless sheeple, excuse me dear reader, I meant people."
This article had it exactly right. Obama is the result of a "sheeple" population that was more interested in his coolness than they were in his policy or experience. We are sliding toward Marxism whether we like it or not because of our own failure as a nation to educate our electorate, allowing them to understand for themselves the danger of a man like Barack Obama in the White House. 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Belt Tightening

2010 Budget: Projected deficits and debt incre...Image via Wikipedia
The President ordered the cabinet to cut a whopping $100 million from the $3.5 trillion federal budget!

I'm so impressed by this sacrifice that I have decided to do the same thing with my personal budget.



I spend about $4000 a month on groceries, medicine, insurance, cable, internet, telephone, gasoline, misc bills, etc, but it's time to get out the budget cutting ax, go line by line through my expenses and go to work.



I'm going to cut my spending at exactly the same ratio -1/35,000 of my total budget.



After doing the math, it looks like instead of spending $4000 a month; I'm going to have to cut that number by twelve cents!

Yes, I'm going to have to get by with $3999.88, but that's what sacrifice is all about. I'll just have to do without some things, that are, frankly, luxuries.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

FLASHBACK: Congressional Democrats Couldn’t Say Where Constitution Authorized Insurance Mandate | CNSnews.com

It is embarrassing that the very people who take an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution are clueless as to its contents.

FLASHBACK: Congressional Democrats Couldn’t Say Where Constitution Authorized Insurance Mandate | CNSnews.com
Enhanced by Zemanta

Keith Olbermann - Possibly Deranged

Keith Olbermann 3Image by afagen via Flickr
by Andrea Peyser, New York Post

In the end, it wasn't Keith Olbermann's wacko politics, bipolar tantrums, or the Comcast takeover that set his MSNBC career on a col lision course with an iceberg.

It was Ben Affleck.

A source formerly with the cable network said the end began in April 2009, when Rachel Maddow booked Hollywood's darling to appear on her show. Olbermann wanted the star for himself on "Countdown."
It was the first battle Keith didn't win.

"In protest, he refused to go on the air," said the ex-colleague.

It wasn't his first meltdown. A year and a half earlier, MSNBC had moved studios from the Jersey boonies to Rockefeller Center. When Olbermann discovered that his new office door had a built-in window, he went ballistic, phoning network President Phil Griffin and threatening to walk.

"I mean literally, Andrea. Over the door!" said the source. "Keith made such a fit about it. He was ugly and mean. But no one came to his defense.

"Part of me feels sorry for him. He can't blame alcoholism. That was just a normal thing for him to throw tantrums." The door was replaced.