The
Bible is a lot of things to a lot of people, but to Christians,
especially, it is a source of inspiration and a guide to daily
living.
To others, the Bible is a historical document and a source of controversy.
To others still, the Bible is a self-contradictory mish-mash of arcane
rules and proscriptions, mostly relevant to long-dead cultures in far
away places.
What is the truth in all of this?
The reality is that it is all true to an extent, and equally nonsensical
at the same time. The Bible has meaning to all its readers, but it is
important to consider that the meaning it has is informed by the
prejudices the reader brings to it.
To really understand the Bible and what it intends to say to present
generations, it is necessary to understand who wrote it and why, and the
cultural context in which it was written. The story is an interesting
one, in no small part because the story is so much messier than most of
its advocates would have you to believe. And its very messiness is why
it is a story rarely told in any completeness to Christian audiences.
The overriding theme of the Bible storylines is the theme of cultural
conquest. Conquest by the Hebrews over their enemy neighbors,
culturally by the Jews over the Israelites (used here to mean members of
the ten "lost" tribes), the Christians over the Jews, the Catholics
over the Gnostics, Marcionites, and other pre-Catholic factions, and on
and on. In some cases, the conquest is recorded as a historical, often
military event. In others, it merely is recorded as a change in content
and context, an alteration of the storyline and outlook and worldview.
And the story of the editing and translation of the final form of the
Bible into what today is regarded as holy scripture is a story not just
of cultural conquest, but of political intrigues, and not just between
competing bishops, but with secular political authority itself. It is
as if the U.S. congress or president were to decide what constituted
Christian doctrine and scripture, and everyone went along - at the peril
of their lives - until no one even questioned the accuracy of the
official viewpoint.
The effect of its origins as selected parts of whole bodies of
scripture, written by at least a hundred and fifty different people in
dozens of different places at different times, many centuries apart, and
for different reasons, colors what its authors wrote. Yet that simple
fact is widely ignored, both by people who naively follow what they read
in it as the inerrant word of God, and by more liberal scholastic
theologians, who seek to understand its historical context as well as a
body of doctrinal scripture, which they often blindly follow, even
though they know full well its messy origins.
The article is fairly lengthy. You can read it at your leisure here:
The Bible And Christianity -- The Historical Origins
No comments:
Post a Comment