Perhaps it would have been more accurate in my blog post “Hillary wins the popular vote – not”
to characterize the inconsistencies in the handling of absentee ballots
as a town-by-town situation rather than a blanket statewide scenario.
There are not, to my knowledge, any formal statutes that forbid the
counting of absentee ballots until or unless the in-person state ballots
have been counted first.
However,
in conversations with town officials, I have learned that it is not
unusual for some officials, faced with late-night eleventh-hour time
horizons and an overwhelmingly one-sided vote tally up and down the
ballot, to adopt a somewhat laissez-faire attitude and call it a wrap
when uncounted or unreceived absentee ballots are not of sufficient
number to influence the outcome. To think that every town official
adheres to an unfailingly airtight approach – even when the outcome
anywhere on the ballot in that district is well beyond even the
slightest question – is to have an unrealistic faith in a theoretical process that is naive to a frighteningly mind-numbing degree.
Read more:
Blog: Counting absentee votes
No comments:
Post a Comment