At the recent televised debate among candidates for the Democrats'
nomination for president, Hillary
Clinton declared that "the wealthy pay
too little" in taxes and "the middle class pays too much."
Some
people might wish to argue about whether that is true or not, but no
rational argument can be made on either side of this issue, because the
words used are completely undefined. Nor is Hillary Clinton the only one
who talks this way.
It is one of the many signs of the
mindlessness of our times that all sorts of people declare that "the
rich" are not paying their "fair share" in taxes, without telling us
concretely what they mean by either "the rich" or "fair share."
Whether
in politics or in the media, words are increasingly used, not to convey
facts or even allegations of facts, but simply to arouse emotions.
Undefined words are a big handicap in logic, but they are a big plus in
politics, where the goal is not clarity but victory -- and the votes of
gullible people count just as much as the votes of people who have
common sense.
What a "fair share" of taxes means in practice is
simply "more." No matter how high the tax rate is on people with a given
income, you can always raise the tax rate further by saying that they
are still not paying their "fair share."
Advocates
of higher tax rates can get very specific when they want to. A recent
article in the New York Times says that raising the tax rate on the top
one percent of income earners to 40 percent would generate "about $157
billion" a year in additional tax revenue for the government.
This
ignores mountains of evidence, going back for generations, showing that
raising tax rates does not automatically mean raising tax revenues --
and has often actually led to falling tax revenues. A fantasy expressed
in numbers is still a fantasy.
When the state of Maryland raised
its tax rate on people with incomes of a million dollars a year or more,
the number of such people living in Maryland fell from nearly 8,000 to
fewer than 6,000. Although it had been projected that the tax revenue
collected from such people in Maryland would rise by $106 million,
instead these revenues FELL by $257 million.
There was a similar
reaction in Oregon and in Britain. Rich people do not simply stand still
to be sheared like sheep. They can either send their money somewhere
else or they can leave themselves.
Currently, there are trillions
of dollars of American money creating jobs overseas, in places where tax
rates are lower. It is easy to transfer money electronically from
country to country. But it is not nearly so easy for unemployed American
workers to transfer themselves to where the jobs have been driven by
high tax rates.
Read the rest:
Politicians' Words - Thomas Sowell - Page 2
No comments:
Post a Comment