Donald Trump’s tax plan calls for reducing the corporate-income tax to
15 percent. That’s about 15 points too high.
Mitt Romney was mocked for insisting “corporations are people,” but he
was right: A corporation is a cooperation, a group of people acting
together as one corpus for a particular purpose. And it would be easier
and more simple to tax the people.
Corporate income is unlike individual or household income in that
it is broadly defined as income minus expenses, meaning ordinary
business expenses, whereas the individual taxpayer can only deduct
certain narrowly defined expenses, such as mortgage interest. The
simplified version: If Corporation X makes $1 billion and has $900
million in expenses, then it has $100 million in taxable income, which
is subject to a top rate of 39 percent. Most corporate income is taxed
at the highest rate.
Even the simplest version of this structure creates opportunities
for shenanigans and incentives to pursue them. But the real-world
version isn’t simple at all, and it makes things much, much worse.
Politicians create tax incentives that reward businesses for doing
things they like and punish them for doing things they don’t like, while
corporate interest groups invest a great deal of time and energy in
lobbying for tax favors. Some of that is pretty crude: Democrats have
for years been trying to monkey with business-expense rules to punish
companies for outsourcing, so that a cardboard box bought for moving
business records from the headquarters in St. Louis to the warehouse
across town would be a deductible expense but the same box used to move
business records to a new call center in the Philippines would not be
deductible. Some of it is more subtle and more complicated, i.e.,
engineering deals and business units in such a way that artificial
capital losses and expenses can be racked up and stored away to reduce
(for tax purposes) future income. There’s an old joke that General
Electric is the world’s greatest tax-law firm, with a sideline in
manufacturing, but consider also that blockbuster films that do billions
of dollars in business routinely show little or no profit for tax
purposes. Famously, Return of the Jedi has never made a dime, so far as
the IRS is concerned.
Read more at:
Read more at:
No comments:
Post a Comment