What
do left-wing Democrats such as Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and
Bernie Sanders have in mind when they demand that wealthy Americans pay
their “fair share” in taxes?
Demanding
that the rich pay their fair share in taxes is part of the age-old
Democrat Party playbook that uses class warfare to acquire and hold
power. It conveys the presumption that the big-money types are unfairly
gaming the tax code so they don’t have to pony-up to Uncle Sam’s coffers
on April 15th.
Sadly,
this ploy often succeeds, probably because leftists are seldom asked to
specify what they mean when they demand somebody pay a fair share in
taxes.
Thomas Sowell
took a step in the right direction in an essay posted on
Nationalreview.com last October 21st. He opened by noting that people
who demand the rich pay their fair share do not specify what either the
rich or fair share mean. Essentially, Sowell stated, fair share means,
simply, “more.”
Sowell
made two important points. First, when governments raise income taxes
on the wealthy, such as Maryland did in 2012, tax revenues actually
fell, because many wealthy people left the state. On the other hand,
when U.S. governments in the 1920s (Coolidge), 1960s (JFK/LBJ), 1980s
(Reagan), and in 2001 (Bush #43) have lowered income tax rates, the
result has been increased revenues.
Sowell
concluded, nevertheless, that cries to “soak the rich” have worked
again and again, and may also succeed in 2016. That’s probably because
terms like the rich and fair share are used “not to convey facts or even
allegations of facts, but simply to arouse emotions.” As he noted,
cries to soak the rich are “one of the many signs of the mindlessness of
our times...”
Read more:
Articles: What Does Fair Share (in Taxes) Mean?
No comments:
Post a Comment